ISSN online: 2221-1616

Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik instituta sotziologii)

Research Article

Tatyana M. Komarova Candidate of Geography, Associate professor,
ICARP FEB RAS, Birobidzhan, Russia
carpi-komarova@yandex.ru
ORCID ID=0000-0002-4308-6882
Irina V. Kalinina Candidate of Geography
ICARP FEB RAS, Birobidzhan, Russia
gaevaiv@yandex.ru
ORCID ID=0000-0002-8628-8505
Sergey A. Solovchenkov Candidate of Sociology
ICARP FEB RAS, Birobidzhan, Russia
solovchenkov@yandex.ru
ORCID ID=0000-0003-2687-725X
Subjective and objective assessments of personal employment at the Russian Far East (Jewish Autonomous Region as a case study).
Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2021. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 101-122

Дата поступления статьи: 30.04.2021
This Article is downloaded: 85 times
Topic: Social Processes In Russian Regions

For citation:
Komarova T. M., Kalinina I. V., Solovchenkov S. A. Subjective and objective assessments of personal employment at the Russian Far East (Jewish Autonomous Region as a case study). Vestnik instituta sotziologii. 2021. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 101-122
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2021.12.2.717


Abstract

Based on objective and subjective assessments, the article draws conclusions about the personal employment of the population of the residents of the Jewish Autonomous Region. The main demographic problems reflecting the current situation in the region are revealed. It is demonstrated that, in comparison with other Far Eastern regions, the Jewish Autonomous Region is in the position of an outsider in some indicators (for example, in mortality), and in others - in a position of a leader (for example, in reducing the growth of unemployment). The general socio-economic situation in the region testifies to the persistence of negative trends in the post-perestroika period. These conclusions are confirmed by the subjective assessments of the residents of the region, obtained in the course of a sociological study. Among the interviewees who consider themselves unemployed, there are both self-employed and economically inactive. It was revealed that about 22% of the respondents are employed in the informal sector, moreover, more than half of them are referred to as “forced-employed”, since they have not been able to officially find a job. The urban population overwhelmingly prefers standard forms of employment, perceiving informal employment rather as a possible addition to the main place of work. In rural areas, the situation is the opposite, since informal employment takes the leading place, in fact performing the functions of the main employment. At the same time, the population rather passively uses the possibilities of obtaining additional income, preferring to live on benefits or to take odd jobs. The population practically does not use the opportunity to improve their qualifications or obtain an additional (new) work specialty. More than 60% of the respondents partially provide for their families, using archaic economic practices, i.e., collecting and processing natural resources (wild plants, hunting and fishing), that may indicate both a certain cultural phenomenon of the local population and a lack of financial resources in a significant part of the population. A certain mythologisation of the role of large agricultural enterprises in the development of the territory take place among the local rural population. A significant part of the surveyed rural population considers the creation of agricultural jobs to be a priority area of ​​development, despite the fact that this type of activity has never been the main one and has not brought much income to the region, given the difficult agro-climatic conditions of the region.

Keywords

interregional migration, personal employment, unemployment, informal types of employment, demographic trends

References

 

  1. Andreev E., Vishnevskij A. Blizhajshie demograficheskie perspektivy Rossii [Immediate demographic prospects for Russia]. Demoskop Weekly: 601-602b: 2-15:06.2014. Accessed 5.03.2020. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2014/0601/s_map.php (in Russ.).

  2. Gimpel'son V. E., Kapeljushnikov R. I. Nestandartnaja zanjatost' i rossijskij rynok truda [Precarious work and the Russian labor market]. Moscow, Izd. dom GU VShJe, 2006: 400 (in Russ.).

  3. Golenkova Z. T., Goliusova YU. V. Prekariat kak novaya gruppa nayemnykh rabotnikov [Precaria as a new group of employees]. Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2015: 1 (195): 47–57 (in Russ.).

  4. Golenkova Z. T., Goliusova YU. V. Rossiyskiy prekariat: problemy nakopleniya chelovecheskogo kapitala [Russian precariat: problems of human capital accumulation]. Vestnik Instituta sotziologii, 2016: 3 (18): 57–69 (in Russ.).

  5. Goliusova YU. V. Problemy sotsial'noy mobil'nosti molodezhi s prekarnoy zanyatost'yu [Problems of social mobility of youth with precarious employment]. Pitirim Sorokin i paradigmy global'nogo razvitiya XXI veka (k 130-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya). Sbornik nauchnykh statey [Pitirim Sorokin and the paradigms of the global development of the Central Agricultural Institute of the century (to the 130th anniversary of his birth). Collection of scientific articles.]. Syktyvkar, Izd-vo SGU im. Pitirima Sorokina, 2019: 94–102 (in Russ.).

  6. Goliusova YU. V. Prekarnaya zanyatost' molodezhi (po rezul'tatam sotsiologicheskikh issledovaniy) [Precarious youth employment (based on the results of sociological research)]. V sbornike: Budushcheye sfery truda: global'nyye vyzovy i regional'noye razvitiye. Sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnogo foruma. Ed. by G.R. Baymurzina, R.M. Valiakhmetov. Ufa, Mir Pechati, 2019: 184–188 (in Russ.).

  7. Goliusova YU. V. Prekarnaya zanyatost' molodezhi kak sposob izbeganiya bezrabotitsy i nezanyatosti [Precarious employment of young people as a way to avoid unemployment and unemployment]. Informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten' Instituta sotsiologii FNISTS RAN, 2019: 4: 74–83. (in Russ.)

  8. Demograficheskij potencial Dal'nego vostoka, ego dinamika i kachestvo [Demographic potential of the Far East, its dynamics and quality]. Accessed 12.03.2021. URL: http://rybakovsky.ru/naseleniereg1.html (in Russ.)

  9. Kalinina I. V., Solovchenkov S. A. Problems of the development of precarious employment in rural areas of the Jewish Autonomous Region. Izvestija Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Serija geograficheskaja, 2018: 4: 33–45. (in Russ.)

  10. Komarova T. M. Current trends in the age and sex structure of the population of the Jewish Autonomous Region. Regional'nye problemy, 2016: 19: 4: 131–134. (in Russ.)

  11. Komarova T. M. Jekonomiko-geograficheskie faktory territorial'noj organizacii hozjajstva Evrejskoj avtonomnoj oblasti na jetape perehoda k rynochnym otnoshenijam [Economic and geographical factors of the territorial organization of the economy of the Jewish Autonomous Region at the stage of transition to market relations]: dis. … kand. geogr. nauk / Ros. akad. nauk. Sibirsk. otd-nie. In-t geografii im. V. B. Sochavy. Irkutsk, 1998: 171 (in Russ.).

  12. Komarova T. M., Kalinina I. V., Mishhuk S. N. Social'no-demograficheskaja bezopasnost' prigranichnogo regiona (na primere Evrejskoj AO) [Socio-demographic security of the border region (on the example of the Jewish Autonomous Region)]. Voprosy geografii. Sb. 141: Problemy regional'nogo razvitija Rossii / Ed by V. M. Kotljakov, V. N. Streleckij, O. B. Glezer, S. G. Safronov. Moscow, Izd. dom Kodeks, 2016: 578–595 (in Russ.).

  13. Komarova T. M., Neverova G. P., Suhoveeva A. B. Demograficheskij krizis i modelirovanie demograficheskogo razvitija prigranichnogo regiona juga Dal'nego Vostoka Rossii (na primere Evrejskoj avtonomnoj oblasti) [Demographic crisis and modeling of the demographic development of the border region in the south of the Russian Far East (on the example of the Jewish Autonomous Region)]. Nacional'nye proekty i sberezhenie nacii. Moscow, 2008: 155–163 (in Russ.).

  14. Mishhuk S. N. Dynamics of internal and international labor migration in the Russian Far East. Nauka. Kul'tura. Obshhestvo, 2020: 1: 68–74 (in Russ.).

  15. Mishhuk S. N., Kalinina I. V. The current socio-economic situation in the Jewish Autonomous Region during the implementation of investment projects. Regional'nye problemy, 2017: 20: 4: 95–102 (in Russ.).

  16. Naselenie Rossii 2013: 21 ezhegodnyj demograficheskij doklad [Population of Russia 2013: 21st annual demographic report]. Ed by S. V. Zaharov. Moscow, Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2015: 428 (in Russ.).

  17. Nikiforova A. A. Rynok truda: zanjatost' i bezrabotica [Labor market: employment and unemployment]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 1991: 184 (in Russ.).

  18. Pavlovskij E. V. Kratkosrochnoe prognozirovanie migracii v Rossii [Short-term forecasting of migration in Russia] dis. … kand. jekon. Nauk, FGBOU Vysshego obrazovanija Sankt-Peterburgskij Gosudarstvennyj Ekonomicheskij Universitet, St. Petersburg, 2019: 181 (in Russ.).

  19. Revuckaja O. L., Krasota T. G. The production potential of the Jewish Autonomous Region: assessment and comparison with the regions of the Far Eastern Federal District. Regional'nye problemy, 2020: 23: 4: 22–34 (in Russ.).

  20. Toshhenko Zh. T. Prekariat: ot protoklassa k novomu klassu [Precariat: from protoclass to a new class]. Moscow, Nauka, 2018: 350 (in Russ.).

  21. Toshhenko Zh. T. Precarious employment is a phenomenon of the modern economy. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2020: 8: 3–13 (in Russ.).